Snip
|
Annual Review of Sociology
|
---|
Categories |
|
---|
For Snip |
loading snip actions ... |
---|---|
For Page |
loading url actions ... |
Sociological studies sensitive to the issue of place are rarely labeled thus, and at the same time there are far too many of them to fit in this review. It may be a good thing that this research is seldom gathered up as a “sociology of place,” for that could ghettoize the subject as something of interest only to geographers, architects, or environmental historians. The point of this review is to indicate that sociologists have a stake in place no matter what they analyze, or how: The works cited below emplace inequality, difference, power, politics, interaction, community, social movements, deviance, crime, life course, science, identity, memory, history. After a prologue of definitions and methodological ruminations, I ask: How do places come to be the way they are, and how do places matter for social practices and historical change?
HTML |
<span class="seriesTitle">Annual Review of Sociology</span><br> <span class="black9pt"> Vol. 26: 463-496 (Volume publication date August 2000) </span><br> <span class="black9pt">(doi:10.1146/annurev.soc.26.1.463)</span><br> <!-- End title of page and review --> <!-- Start full text content --> <div class="articleContent"> <!-- abstract content --><div class="arttitle">A Space for Place in Sociology</div><p class="fulltext"></p><div class="artAuthors"><strong><nobr>Thomas F. Gieryn</nobr> </strong><br><div class="fulltext">Department of Sociology, Indiana University, Bloomington, Indiana 47405; email: <a class="ref email" href="mailto:gieryn@indiana.edu">gieryn@indiana.edu</a></div><br></div><div class="abstractSection"> <p class="first last">Sociological studies sensitive to the issue of place are rarely labeled thus, and at the same time there are far too many of them to fit in this review. It may be a good thing that this research is seldom gathered up as a “sociology <i>of</i> place,” for that could ghettoize the subject as something of interest only to geographers, architects, or environmental historians. The point of this review is to indicate that sociologists have a stake in place no matter what they analyze, or how: The works cited below <i>emplace</i> inequality, difference, power, politics, interaction, community, social movements, deviance, crime, life course, science, identity, memory, history. After a prologue of definitions and methodological ruminations, I ask: How do places come to be the way they are, and how do places matter for social practices and historical change?</p></div></div> |
---|