<h1>Bad Moves</h1> <p>Bad Moves is a series by philosopher Julian Baggini detailing the various ways in which arguments or points are made badly, but often persuasively. <a href="http://www.julianbaggini.com">Julian Baggini</a> is editor of <i><a href="http://www.philosophers.co.uk">The Philosophers' Magazine</a></i>.</p> <p align="center"><img src="images/rule.jpg" height="1" width="600"></p> <p></p><ul> <li><a href="http://www.butterfliesandwheels.com/badmovesprint.php?num=65"><b>The innocent have nothing to fear</b></a></li> <li><a href="http://www.butterfliesandwheels.com/badmovesprint.php?num=64"><b>Motivation speculation</b></a></li> <li><a href="http://www.butterfliesandwheels.com/badmovesprint.php?num=63"><b>Category Mistakes</b></a></li> <li><a href="http://www.butterfliesandwheels.com/badmovesprint.php?num=62"><b>It worked for me&#x2026;</b></a></li> <li><a href="http://www.butterfliesandwheels.com/badmovesprint.php?num=61"><b>Contorting to balance</b></a></li> <li><a href="http://www.butterfliesandwheels.com/badmovesprint.php?num=60"><b>Don't You Look Pretty Today</b></a></li> <li><a href="http://www.butterfliesandwheels.com/badmovesprint.php?num=58"><b>Mood music</b></a></li> <li><a href="http://www.butterfliesandwheels.com/badmovesprint.php?num=57"><b>Percipi est esse</b></a></li> <li><a href="http://www.butterfliesandwheels.com/badmovesprint.php?num=56"><b>Scare-mongering</b></a></li> <li><a href="http://www.butterfliesandwheels.com/badmovesprint.php?num=55"><b>Bold assertion</b></a></li> <li><a href="http://www.butterfliesandwheels.com/badmovesprint.php?num=54"><b>It didn&#x2019;t work then, so&#x2026;</b></a></li> <li><a href="http://www.butterfliesandwheels.com/badmovesprint.php?num=53"><b>Fallacy of equivocation</b></a></li> <li><a href="http://www.butterfliesandwheels.com/badmovesprint.php?num=52"><b>Partial defence = support</b></a></li> <li><a href="http://www.butterfliesandwheels.com/badmovesprint.php?num=51"><b>High redefinition</b></a></li> <li><a href="http://www.butterfliesandwheels.com/badmovesprint.php?num=50"><b>The gambler's fallacy</b></a></li> <li><a href="http://www.butterfliesandwheels.com/badmovesprint.php?num=49"><b>How else do you explain it?</b></a></li> <li><a href="http://www.butterfliesandwheels.com/badmovesprint.php?num=48"><b>It's a free country</b></a></li> <li><a href="http://www.butterfliesandwheels.com/badmovesprint.php?num=47"><b>Tu quoque</b></a></li> <li><a href="http://www.butterfliesandwheels.com/badmovesprint.php?num=46"><b>Ought without can</b></a></li> <li><a href="http://www.butterfliesandwheels.com/badmovesprint.php?num=45"><b>Genetic fallacies</b></a></li> </ul><p></p> <p><a href="dispatches.php"></a></p>