Snip
|
the court held that the exclusion was not invoked — s... not “a program for a computer … as such.” The UKIP... issued guidance (available here) confirming that:
|
---|
Categories |
|
---|
For Snip |
loading snip actions ... |
---|---|
For Page |
loading url actions ... |
the court held that the exclusion was not invoked — such an AI system is not “a program for a computer … as such.” The UKIPO has subsequently issued guidance (available here) confirming that:
“Patent examiners should not object to inventions involving ANNs under the ‘program for a computer’ exclusion.”
HTML |
<p> the court held that the exclusion was not invoked — such an AI system is not “a program for a computer … as such.” The UKIPO has subsequently issued guidance (available <a href="https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/examination-of-patent-applications-involving-artificial-neural-networks/examination-of-patent-applications-involving-artificial-neural-networks-ann">here</a>) confirming that:</p><p style="margin-left: 0.5in">“Patent examiners should not object to inventions involving ANNs under the ‘program for a computer’ exclusion.”</p> |
---|