Snip
|
A group of Chinese scientists published their research i... peer-reviewed, open-source journal on January 5. The stu... paper that looked at the biomechanics of the human hand....
|
---|
Categories |
|
---|
For Snip |
loading snip actions ... |
---|---|
For Page |
loading url actions ... |
A group of Chinese scientists published their research in the peer-reviewed, open-source journal on January 5. The study was a scientific paper that looked at the biomechanics of the human hand. However, the paper mentioned “the Creator” in the paper’s abstract and then twice in the study.
One of the sentences read: “Hand coordination should indicate the mystery of the Creator’s invention.”
The word’s association with creationism and intelligent design has spurred a stream of negative comments on the PLOS ONE article, as well as on Twitter, with many people demanding that the “shameful” and “unacceptable” paper be redacted or removed.
HTML |
<p>A group of Chinese scientists published their research in the peer-reviewed, open-source journal on January 5. <a href="http://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371%2Fjournal.pone.0146193">The study</a> was a scientific paper that looked at the biomechanics of the human hand. However, the paper mentioned “the Creator” in the paper’s abstract and then twice in the study.</p> <p>One of the sentences read: “Hand coordination should indicate the mystery of the Creator’s invention.”</p> <p>The word’s association with creationism and intelligent design has spurred a stream of <a href="http://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/comments?id=10.1371%2Fjournal.pone.0146193">negative comments</a> on the PLOS ONE article, as well as on Twitter, with many people demanding that the “shameful” and “unacceptable” paper be redacted or removed.</p> |
---|